Sipp’n Corn Bourbon Review – Corner Creek Reserve

Bourbon:         Corner Creek Reserve Bourbon Whiskey.  88 Proof; NAS.

Distillery:        Who knows?  The label states “Corner Creek Distilling Co.,” but that’s just one of the many assumed names of Kentucky Bourbon Distillers, Ltd.  Worse, this assumed name has been inactive since 2003.  Does KBD have so many assumed names that it can’t keep track of them and renew the certificates as needed?

Cost:                $25.99

Color:

Light amber.

Nose:

Not complex.  Soft nut and vanilla flavors.  It lost any discernable nose with a splash of water.

Taste:

No heat or bite, which I missed.  Smooth and sweet, and no complexity.  The lower proof was noticeable.  Definitely drink Corner Creek neat; it’s already watered-down enough.

Finish:

A dry finish that was only slightly warm and pretty short.  Oak flavors dominated, with a little medicinal flavors at the very end.

Rating:

While bourbon hunting I struck up a conversation with the owner of a small liquor store in LaGrange, Kentucky.  Of course he didn’t have what I was looking for, but he went on and on about Corner Creek.  He has family in from Pennsylvania every Thanksgiving and they make special requests for him to be sure to have Corner Creek.  Then he told me a story about how Corner Creek was started by guys from the wine business who are now distilling in Bardstown.  I hoped that he was just misinformed instead of lying to me, because I knew that Corner Creek was part of the KBD portfolio. 

Maybe he was just relying on the label, which claims Corner Creek is produced “in the tradition of the great wine importers,” or maybe it was the wine-styled bottle (with the Bob Ross landscape art).  Or maybe it was just a sales pitch.  But he was extremely friendly so I didn’t challenge him.  Not only that, I decided to buy a bottle.

My final recommendation is that Corner Creek is fine, but it’s under-powered and it left me wishing for more complexity and bite.  Additionally, there are so many other options in this crowded price range (or lower) that you should try first, like Four Roses “Yellow Label” and Small Batch, Elijah Craig 12, anything in the Weller lineup, Maker’s Mark or Bulleit.  As a bonus, we know where each of those are distilled and aged (even Bulleit, at least for the time being).  I would prefer all of these over Corner Creek.

Score on The Sipp’n Corn Scale:  2.5

The Sipp’n Corn Scale:

1 – Wouldn’t even accept a free drink of it.

2 – Would gladly drink it if someone else was buying.

3 – Glad to include this in my bar.

4 – Excellent bourbon.  Worth the price and I’m sure to always have it in my bar.

5 – Wow.  I’ll search high and low to get another bottle of this.

Sipp’n Corn Bourbon Review – Eagle Rare vs. Bulleit vs. Michter’s: “The 10-Year Challenge”

For this Bourbon Review, I wanted to find three bourbons aged exactly the same number of years, all with rye as the secondary grain, and all with similar Proof, but priced very differently.  Three bourbons meeting those criteria are Eagle Rare Single Barrel 10-Year, Bulleit Bourbon 10-Year Small Batch and Michter’s Single Barrel 10-Year, so “The 10-Year Challenge” was born.  Would the hard-to-find, expensive bourbon come out on top?  Or would the readily-available $30 bottle teach us all a valuable lesson?

Bourbons in order of blind tasting:

·         Eagle Rare Single Barrel 10-Year (90 proof; $29.99);

·         Bulleit Bourbon 10-Year Small Batch (91.2 proof; $39.99);

·         Michter’s Single Barrel 10-Year (94.4 proof; $85.99).

1st Glass (Eagle Rare):

The first glass was a favorite of many of our tasters right away.  The nose was light and not particularly complex, but pleasant.  Common tasting notes included a nice balance of oaky and sweet flavors.  The finish was dry and short to medium.

2nd Glass (Bulleit):

Two of the tasters had an immediate negative reaction to the second glass.  But overall, reviews were good (ultimately just not better that the first and third glasses).  The second glass had a much more fragrant nose than the first, which was followed by a bolder taste and more complex and longer finish.  Caramel, vanilla, oaky, citrus and aggressive spice were all common tasting notes.

3rd Glass (Michter’s):

The third glass was noticeably darker in appearance, a rich caramel compared to the lighter amber of the first two glasses.  Like the second glass, the nose was much more prominent and bold, but it differed from the second glass by having more of a smoky, earthy nose.  Tasting notes were dominated by comments about its complexity.  Licorice, oak, caramel, vanilla, sweet corn, buttery, and warm spices were all noticeable.  The tasters liked the comparatively longer and warmer finish, too.

Winner:

Out of eight tasters, our results were all over the board.  All three received 1^st, 2^nd and 3^rd place votes, but Michter’s slightly nudged out Eagle Rare with one more 1^st place vote.  Michter’s also only received a single 3^rd place vote, while Eagle Rare received two.  Bulleit only received one 1^st place vote, and received a stunning five 3^rd place votes.  So Michter’s won by a nose, with Eagle Rare very close behind, and Bulleit a distant third.

Bottom Line:

I had some initial hesitancy about including two NDP (non-distiller producer) bourbons compared to just one bourbon, Eagle Rare, where the distillery, Buffalo Trace, is known.  I even received some immediate Twitter feedback from my post on the night of this event for including two NDPs.  But I got over this hesitancy pretty quickly because Bulleit and Michter’s fit the theme, popular belief is that this Bulleit is a Four Roses recipe, and good bourbon is good bourbon, no matter what liberties marketers take.

I was pleased to see that, despite their similarities, these three bourbons were all very different from each other and that no one bourbon stood out from the others.  That lack of separation, however, requires consideration about price.  The Eagle Rare is the clear price-performer of the three, and given its results at the tasting, Eagle Rare 10-Year is a no-brainer to add to your shelf. 

But personally, I scored the Bulleit higher than anyone else (then again, I’m also a big fan of Four Roses).  I think that the tasters who preferred Eagle Rare would probably prefer Bulleit in a cocktail because its bolder flavors don’t get lost, so depending on how you plan to drink these bourbons, my recommendation would change.

Finally, even though it was the overall winner and even though I really liked it, I expected the Michter’s to completely wow me (it didn't).  For anyone else who expects an almost $90 bourbon to wow them, then you may be better off sticking with Eagle Rare and Bulleit, which are readily available everywhere.  Still, Michter’s won The 10-Year Challenge, and its profile is very different than the other two options, so if you’re splurging and can find it, it's worth a look.

My final recommendation is that while Eagle Rare 10-Year, Bulleit 10-Year and Michter’s 10-Year may be better than each other on different occasions, all three are great buys that deserve room on your shelf. 

Scores on The Sipp’n Corn Scale

Eagle Rare Single Barrel 10-Year:  4.0

Bulleit 10-Year Small Batch:  3.0

Michter’s Single Barrel 10-Year:  4.0

The Sipp’n Corn Scale:

1 – Wouldn’t even accept a free drink of it.

2 – Would gladly drink it if someone else was buying.

3 – Glad to include this in my bar.

4 – Excellent bourbon.  Worth the price and I’m sure to always have it in my bar.

5 – Wow.  I’ll search high and low to get another bottle of this.