Don't miss a post -- follow @SippnCorn on Twitter

Saturday, November 9, 2013

Sipp’n Corn Bourbon Review – Eagle Rare vs. Bulleit vs. Michter’s: “The 10-Year Challenge”


For this Bourbon Review, I wanted to find three bourbons aged exactly the same number of years, all with rye as the secondary grain, and all with similar Proof, but priced very differently.  Three bourbons meeting those criteria are Eagle Rare Single Barrel 10-Year, Bulleit Bourbon 10-Year Small Batch and Michter’s Single Barrel 10-Year, so “The 10-Year Challenge” was born.  Would the hard-to-find, expensive bourbon come out on top?  Or would the readily-available $30 bottle teach us all a valuable lesson?

Bourbons in order of blind tasting:
·         Eagle Rare Single Barrel 10-Year (90 proof; $29.99);
·         Bulleit Bourbon 10-Year Small Batch (91.2 proof; $39.99);
·         Michter’s Single Barrel 10-Year (94.4 proof; $85.99).


1st Glass (Eagle Rare):

The first glass was a favorite of many of our tasters right away.  The nose was light and not particularly complex, but pleasant.  Common tasting notes included a nice balance of oaky and sweet flavors.  The finish was dry and short to medium.

2nd Glass (Bulleit):

Two of the tasters had an immediate negative reaction to the second glass.  But overall, reviews were good (ultimately just not better that the first and third glasses).  The second glass had a much more fragrant nose than the first, which was followed by a bolder taste and more complex and longer finish.  Caramel, vanilla, oaky, citrus and aggressive spice were all common tasting notes.

3rd Glass (Michter’s):

The third glass was noticeably darker in appearance, a rich caramel compared to the lighter amber of the first two glasses.  Like the second glass, the nose was much more prominent and bold, but it differed from the second glass by having more of a smoky, earthy nose.  Tasting notes were dominated by comments about its complexity.  Licorice, oak, caramel, vanilla, sweet corn, buttery, and warm spices were all noticeable.  The tasters liked the comparatively longer and warmer finish, too.

Winner:

Out of eight tasters, our results were all over the board.  All three received 1st, 2nd and 3rd place votes, but Michter’s slightly nudged out Eagle Rare with one more 1st place vote.  Michter’s also only received a single 3rd place vote, while Eagle Rare received two.  Bulleit only received one 1st place vote, and received a stunning five 3rd place votes.  So Michter’s won by a nose, with Eagle Rare very close behind, and Bulleit a distant third.

Bottom Line:

I had some initial hesitancy about including two NDP (non-distiller producer) bourbons compared to just one bourbon, Eagle Rare, where the distillery, Buffalo Trace, is known.  I even received some immediate Twitter feedback from my post on the night of this event for including two NDPs.  But I got over this hesitancy pretty quickly because Bulleit and Michter’s fit the theme, popular belief is that this Bulleit is a Four Roses recipe, and good bourbon is good bourbon, no matter what liberties marketers take.

I was pleased to see that, despite their similarities, these three bourbons were all very different from each other and that no one bourbon stood out from the others.  That lack of separation, however, requires consideration about price.  The Eagle Rare is the clear price-performer of the three, and given its results at the tasting, Eagle Rare 10-Year is a no-brainer to add to your shelf. 

But personally, I scored the Bulleit higher than anyone else (then again, I’m also a big fan of Four Roses).  I think that the tasters who preferred Eagle Rare would probably prefer Bulleit in a cocktail because its bolder flavors don’t get lost, so depending on how you plan to drink these bourbons, my recommendation would change.

Finally, even though it was the overall winner and even though I really liked it, I expected the Michter’s to completely wow me (it didn't).  For anyone else who expects an almost $90 bourbon to wow them, then you may be better off sticking with Eagle Rare and Bulleit, which are readily available everywhere.  Still, Michter’s won The 10-Year Challenge, and its profile is very different than the other two options, so if you’re splurging and can find it, it's worth a look.

My final recommendation is that while Eagle Rare 10-Year, Bulleit 10-Year and Michter’s 10-Year may be better than each other on different occasions, all three are great buys that deserve room on your shelf. 

Scores on The Sipp’n Corn Scale
Eagle Rare Single Barrel 10-Year:  4.0
Bulleit 10-Year Small Batch:  4.0
Michter’s Single Barrel 10-Year:  4.0


The Sipp’n Corn Scale™:
1 – Wouldn’t even accept a free drink of it.
2 – Would gladly drink it if someone else was buying.
3 – Glad to include this in my bar.
4 – Excellent bourbon.  Worth the price and I’m sure to always have it in my bar.
5 – Wow.  I’ll search high and low to get another bottle of this.



2 comments:

  1. Great reviews: both useful and informative. I appreciate the way you clarify different criteria that influence ratings and make this very user friendly. Of course, I just happen to agree with the conclusions, but even if I didn't, the tasting is decribed in a way to be helpful even to those who might not share the tastes of your tasting panel.

    Kudos!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for the feedback. I've got more at @sippncorn. But this was definitely one of my favorite tasting events!

    ReplyDelete