I’ll be the first to admit that I’m
Bourbon-centric, after all, that’s my model, so I embrace it. However, through my blog I’ve been able to
meet and talk with people who appreciate all kinds of whiskey and whisky. Many of us (me included) compare whiskies and
turn it into a competition over which we think is the best, but others find the
time and the place to enjoy the wider variety.
As part of broadening my own
horizons, I starting trying Scotch in earnest, with an eye toward
finding Scotch that will appeal to the Bourbon enthusiast. I landed on a handful that I’ll review in a
future post, but there are so many
Scotch whiskies to try, I needed to find a way to knock several out without
intruding on my Bourbon budget, and without becoming too reliant on the
generosity of friends who have sent Scotch samples.
The answer came to me from Flaviar,
which in addition to selling bottles online, offers a variety of different sample
packages. Flaviar sent me (gratis) its “5 Flavours of Scotch”
sample package, which included 45 mL samples of Auchentoshan 12 year, The
Glenlivit 18 year, Singleton of Dufftown 15 year, Laphroaig Quarter Cask, and
Lagavulin 16 year. I had only previously
had two of the five – a flight of Auchentoshan offerings, and a sample of the
Lagavulin 16 year – so I was excited to try a mostly-new lineup. So here are my thoughts about Scotch from the perspective of a Bourbon enthusiast and admitted Scotch novice:
Whisky:
|
Auchentoshan 12
year old
|
||
Region:
|
Lowlands
|
||
ABV:
|
40%
|
||
Tasting Notes
|
|||
Appearance:
|
Light copper.
|
||
Aroma:
|
Light fruit, malt, citrus zest, nutty, and grassy fields.
|
||
Taste:
|
Malty, some citrus, ginger, and vanilla. Overall, not really much going on here, but
inoffensive.
|
||
Finish:
|
Short-to-medium, with a slight drying ginger tang.
|
||
Whisky:
|
The Glenlivet 18
year old
|
||
Region:
|
Speyside
|
||
ABV:
|
43%
|
||
Tasting Notes
|
|||
Appearance:
|
Light golden amber.
|
||
Aroma:
|
Richly fruity, green apple, finally some oak, nuttiness,
toffee, orange citrus, and dark chocolate.
|
||
Taste:
|
Really enjoyable rich sweetness, like nougat, caramel,
honey, and malt. After my first run,
this was my favorite of the five.
|
||
Finish:
|
Long and lingering with dark fruit and oakiness.
|
||
Whisky:
|
Singleton of
Dufftown 15 year old
|
||
Region:
|
Speyside
|
||
ABV:
|
40%
|
||
Tasting Notes
|
|||
Appearance:
|
Light gold.
|
||
Aroma:
|
A little more prominent malt, along with some vanilla
waxiness and light fruit, and slightly smoky.
|
||
Taste:
|
Light fruit dominates, with malt again like the nose, along
with citrus zest and some nuttiness for overall light, subtle flavors, but
slightly medicinal. I was hoping for
more after the nose.
|
||
Finish:
|
Short-ish in length, somewhat non-descript because of the
faintness of the flavors, but nice transition from pear to drying pepper
spice.
|
||
Whisky:
|
Laphroaig Quarter
Cask
|
||
Region:
|
Islay
|
||
ABV:
|
45%
|
||
Tasting Notes
|
|||
Appearance:
|
Light amber (lightest of all five).
|
||
Aroma:
|
Peat, smoke, and salty right away, and then after some
time, coconut, berries, and grasses.
|
||
Taste:
|
Immature heat, pronounced campfire smoke, malt, oaky, and
earthy flavors.
|
||
Finish:
|
Medium and mostly all ashtray.
|
||
Whisky:
|
Lagavulin 16 year
old
|
||
Region:
|
Islay
|
||
ABV:
|
43%
|
||
Tasting Notes
|
|||
Appearance:
|
Solid, silky amber (darkest of all five).
|
||
Aroma:
|
Pungent smoke, peat, iodine, and more smoke, with
underlying berry sweetness. Despite
more prominent smoke, it was much better than the Laphroaig.
|
||
Taste:
|
Under the campfire and cigar smoke, I was able to find
incredible complexity. I particularly
enjoyed the dark fruit, dark chocolate, oak, and maltiness of this robust –
yet elegant – whisky. It surprised me,
and I’m still thinking about it.
|
||
Finish:
|
Smoke that lingered for a long time, with just enough sweetness, nuttiness, and coffee to prevent
the campfire from being overpowering.
The flavors stuck with me, like after a cigar.
|
||
Bottom Line
The Glenlivet 18 and the
Lagavulin 16 are the only two that tempt me for purchase, although they’re very
different, and I foresee vastly different scenarios where I’d enjoy each. Still, compared to all of these, I missed
Bourbon’s sweetness, kick of rye spice, and the dark oakiness that comes with
extra aging. Especially at retail prices
for a bottle, there are probably ten Bourbons I would want to hunt down before buying
any of these Scotch Whiskies.
That’s the
beauty of samples though, so thanks to Flaviar for the “5 Flavours of Scotch”
sample package. If you’re interested and your state allows shipping,
check out Flaviar at this link: https://flaviar.com/. Flaviar offers a type of commission for
promoting and linking through partner sites, but this is not one of those
links, so I have no financial interest in anyone clicking the link, all in
the spirit of full disclosure and maintaining my independence.
So how in the world does someone living in the Commonwealth of Kentucky get sample spirits from Flavier shipped presumably to their address in Jefferson County, Kentucky? I thought that these actions are a direct violation of KRS 244.165 (1)? You are the secular priest...you tell me.
ReplyDeleteOf course I’m aware of KRS 244.165, and presumably retailers are too. If you check the Flaviar website – and the websites of other retailers who ship – Kentucky is always on the “sorry, but we can’t ship to you” list. That’s why Kentuckians have these retailers ship to friends and family in Ohio.
DeleteAs noted in my post, however, there was no sale involved here. Perhaps you missed that the statute applies to the “unlawful sale and shipment by out-of-state-seller directly to a Kentucky consumer.”
Also, if you read the statute, you’ll see that it applies to “any person in the business of selling alcoholic beverages in another state or country.” That may be one of the reasons why PR firms are the ones who ship media samples to scores of reviewers in Kentucky and other states with similar laws.
I appreciate that you’re reading my blog, but it’s dangerous to jump to conclusions, to make accusations, or to try to interpret statutes without knowing the facts.
What is an uptight prig like "Anonymous" doing reading a booze blog anyway? Nosing his or her way into other peoples' private lives, as usual.
ReplyDeleteHa! Thanks Josh!
Delete